<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They&#8217;re watching your edits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journalistopia.com/2006/11/03/theyre-watching-your-edits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journalistopia.com/2006/11/03/theyre-watching-your-edits/</link>
	<description>A world for online journalists. Come all ye scribes, artists and innovators of the press.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Journalistopia &#187; SofaTube: A different way of looking at content</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2006/11/03/theyre-watching-your-edits/comment-page-1/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalistopia &#187; SofaTube: A different way of looking at content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/2006/11/03/theyre-watching-your-edits/#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>[...] But picture this: How long will it be before someone starts remixing your news site&#8217;s headlines or other content into something more user friendly? Or, as I&#8217;ve said before, a site like News Sniffer may come along to monitor all your edits and republish all the filthy comments that are moderated. Either way, I get the feeling that Google News is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to this sort of thing. Should such operations be embraced for the attention and interest they generate? Or will they eventually go too far with using the five-finger discount for content? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But picture this: How long will it be before someone starts remixing your news site&#8217;s headlines or other content into something more user friendly? Or, as I&#8217;ve said before, a site like News Sniffer may come along to monitor all your edits and republish all the filthy comments that are moderated. Either way, I get the feeling that Google News is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to this sort of thing. Should such operations be embraced for the attention and interest they generate? Or will they eventually go too far with using the five-finger discount for content? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journalistopia &#187; They&#8217;re watching your edits (Part II)</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2006/11/03/theyre-watching-your-edits/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalistopia &#187; They&#8217;re watching your edits (Part II)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/2006/11/03/theyre-watching-your-edits/#comment-337</guid>
		<description>[...] Add to that, the NewsSniffer site, which tracks all of the changes made to BBC articles, such as corrections, style changes, added paragraphs and anything else (SEE: &#8216;They&#8217;re watching your edits&#8217;). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Add to that, the NewsSniffer site, which tracks all of the changes made to BBC articles, such as corrections, style changes, added paragraphs and anything else (SEE: &#8216;They&#8217;re watching your edits&#8217;). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
