<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogger takes long view, makes metrics discovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journalistopia.com/2007/07/13/blogger-takes-long-view-makes-metrics-discovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journalistopia.com/2007/07/13/blogger-takes-long-view-makes-metrics-discovery/</link>
	<description>A world for online journalists. Come all ye scribes, artists and innovators of the press.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 01:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Linder</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2007/07/13/blogger-takes-long-view-makes-metrics-discovery/comment-page-1/#comment-9482</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/2007/07/13/blogger-takes-long-view-makes-metrics-discovery/#comment-9482</guid>
		<description>Although a curious thing about StumbleUpon traffic is that it comes in waves.

The few times I&#039;ve gotten major traffic from StumbleUpon, it&#039;s come shortly after the story was first &quot;stumbled.&quot; Hundreds or thousands of readers will visit the page for a few days until everyone runs out of steam. 

Then I won&#039;t get a single hit from StumbleUpon for a few days, and then a handful of people will trickle in every few days. 

A month later, someone else might discover and like the article that was first submitted, and the whole thing starts over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although a curious thing about StumbleUpon traffic is that it comes in waves.</p>
<p>The few times I&#8217;ve gotten major traffic from StumbleUpon, it&#8217;s come shortly after the story was first &#8220;stumbled.&#8221; Hundreds or thousands of readers will visit the page for a few days until everyone runs out of steam. </p>
<p>Then I won&#8217;t get a single hit from StumbleUpon for a few days, and then a handful of people will trickle in every few days. </p>
<p>A month later, someone else might discover and like the article that was first submitted, and the whole thing starts over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindy McAdams</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2007/07/13/blogger-takes-long-view-makes-metrics-discovery/comment-page-1/#comment-9312</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy McAdams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/2007/07/13/blogger-takes-long-view-makes-metrics-discovery/#comment-9312</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s &quot;the long tail&quot; in action. Some content really has legs. I think Digg is much more skewed toward &quot;what is hot right now&quot; and StumbleUpon is much more random, allowing us to discover stuff we missed when it was hot (and fodder for Digg).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s &#8220;the long tail&#8221; in action. Some content really has legs. I think Digg is much more skewed toward &#8220;what is hot right now&#8221; and StumbleUpon is much more random, allowing us to discover stuff we missed when it was hot (and fodder for Digg).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

