<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eliminate the &#8220;Most E-Mailed&#8221; list? Bushwah!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journalistopia.com/2007/11/06/eliminate-the-most-e-mailed-list-bushwah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journalistopia.com/2007/11/06/eliminate-the-most-e-mailed-list-bushwah/</link>
	<description>A world for online journalists. Come all ye scribes, artists and innovators of the press.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 01:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2007/11/06/eliminate-the-most-e-mailed-list-bushwah/comment-page-1/#comment-16665</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/2007/11/06/eliminate-the-most-e-mailed-list-bushwah/#comment-16665</guid>
		<description>I think you hit the nail on the head Shawn. Reporters shouldn&#039;t be weighing that most viewed list as the primary measure of a story&#039;s worth. Personally, I enjoy seeing what has been the most e-mailed more than the most viewed. That, to me, is the equivalent of clipping an article and giving it to a friend. Of course, the ugly dog reigns there too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you hit the nail on the head Shawn. Reporters shouldn&#8217;t be weighing that most viewed list as the primary measure of a story&#8217;s worth. Personally, I enjoy seeing what has been the most e-mailed more than the most viewed. That, to me, is the equivalent of clipping an article and giving it to a friend. Of course, the ugly dog reigns there too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawn smith</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2007/11/06/eliminate-the-most-e-mailed-list-bushwah/comment-page-1/#comment-16537</link>
		<dc:creator>shawn smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/2007/11/06/eliminate-the-most-e-mailed-list-bushwah/#comment-16537</guid>
		<description>Wow, I didn&#039;t know you battled the &quot;world&#039;s ugliest dog&quot; story. Pretty cool. As a reader, I would add that these lists are definitely a traffic generator. I often click these stories to see what others are reading. A better metric for writers to listen to is how many people are reacting to their stories and how the readers are reacting. Traffic numbers don&#039;t excite me as much as seeing conversation start from a story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I didn&#8217;t know you battled the &#8220;world&#8217;s ugliest dog&#8221; story. Pretty cool. As a reader, I would add that these lists are definitely a traffic generator. I often click these stories to see what others are reading. A better metric for writers to listen to is how many people are reacting to their stories and how the readers are reacting. Traffic numbers don&#8217;t excite me as much as seeing conversation start from a story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Withers</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2007/11/06/eliminate-the-most-e-mailed-list-bushwah/comment-page-1/#comment-16272</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Withers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/2007/11/06/eliminate-the-most-e-mailed-list-bushwah/#comment-16272</guid>
		<description>I think a lot of this has to do with the battle constantly going on between journalists and readers. I&#039;m just entering the world of journalism, but I&#039;ve already noticed the patronizing way many journalists view their readers, from comments made in news meetings by editors to arguments between writers and readers on Web sites. There&#039;s a common viewpoint among journalists that says &quot;I&#039;m the professional. I know what&#039;s good for you, so forget about your drunk starlets and football. Read what I have to say about the world, because my writing will expand your mind.&quot; 

Actually, this viewpoint is shared by many officials who work towards the public good. I once watched a public art committee argue over whether or not they should get feedback from the local citizens; they were afraid the common folks would demand things like art based on the local sports teams and that they&#039;d actually have to listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of this has to do with the battle constantly going on between journalists and readers. I&#8217;m just entering the world of journalism, but I&#8217;ve already noticed the patronizing way many journalists view their readers, from comments made in news meetings by editors to arguments between writers and readers on Web sites. There&#8217;s a common viewpoint among journalists that says &#8220;I&#8217;m the professional. I know what&#8217;s good for you, so forget about your drunk starlets and football. Read what I have to say about the world, because my writing will expand your mind.&#8221; </p>
<p>Actually, this viewpoint is shared by many officials who work towards the public good. I once watched a public art committee argue over whether or not they should get feedback from the local citizens; they were afraid the common folks would demand things like art based on the local sports teams and that they&#8217;d actually have to listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

