<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Serious trouble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journalistopia.com/2008/03/28/serious-trouble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journalistopia.com/2008/03/28/serious-trouble/</link>
	<description>A world for online journalists. Come all ye scribes, artists and innovators of the press.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 01:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2008/03/28/serious-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-30837</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/2008/03/28/serious-trouble/#comment-30837</guid>
		<description>Though that last line was mostly in jest, you raise an interesting point:

Innovation has historically happened in increments, contrary to popular belief. For instance, when you come up with a neat way to arrange photos online, you&#039;re standing on the shoulders of thousands  of innovations, right down to the screws in the camera used to take the photos and the mining techniques used to gather the metal for them. Even in Google&#039;s case, there were plenty of folks building search engines before Larry and Sergey came along (check out &quot;The Search&quot;).

The important thing is to question the things we assume to be etched in stone. We must explore other industries, examine what&#039;s going on outside the States, try to look at what we do with fresh eyes and keep doggedly working this situation until we can make something happen.

A recommendation: Take a gander at Scott Berkun&#039;s &quot;Myths of Innovation&quot; (recently removed from the list at right). Really good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though that last line was mostly in jest, you raise an interesting point:</p>
<p>Innovation has historically happened in increments, contrary to popular belief. For instance, when you come up with a neat way to arrange photos online, you&#8217;re standing on the shoulders of thousands  of innovations, right down to the screws in the camera used to take the photos and the mining techniques used to gather the metal for them. Even in Google&#8217;s case, there were plenty of folks building search engines before Larry and Sergey came along (check out &#8220;The Search&#8221;).</p>
<p>The important thing is to question the things we assume to be etched in stone. We must explore other industries, examine what&#8217;s going on outside the States, try to look at what we do with fresh eyes and keep doggedly working this situation until we can make something happen.</p>
<p>A recommendation: Take a gander at Scott Berkun&#8217;s &#8220;Myths of Innovation&#8221; (recently removed from the list at right). Really good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac Echola</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2008/03/28/serious-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-30824</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac Echola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/2008/03/28/serious-trouble/#comment-30824</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think any big money making scheme will do the trick. It&#039;ll take a lot of small innovations to get where we need to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think any big money making scheme will do the trick. It&#8217;ll take a lot of small innovations to get where we need to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

