<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GateHouse Lawsuit vs. New York Times Co. has Dire Implications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journalistopia.com/2008/12/23/gatehouse-lawsuit-new-york-times-dire-implications-for-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journalistopia.com/2008/12/23/gatehouse-lawsuit-new-york-times-dire-implications-for-internet/</link>
	<description>A world for online journalists. Come all ye scribes, artists and innovators of the press.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Howard Owens: &#8220;They would probably win on that one&#8221; &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2008/12/23/gatehouse-lawsuit-new-york-times-dire-implications-for-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-32365</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Owens: &#8220;They would probably win on that one&#8221; &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 01:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/?p=716#comment-32365</guid>
		<description>[...] GateHouse filed its original complaint in November, the company was roundly criticized across the blogosphere for pushing back against the culture of linking that has come to define online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GateHouse filed its original complaint in November, the company was roundly criticized across the blogosphere for pushing back against the culture of linking that has come to define online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerd Kamp</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2008/12/23/gatehouse-lawsuit-new-york-times-dire-implications-for-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-32064</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerd Kamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 08:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/?p=716#comment-32064</guid>
		<description>Fortunately in Germany there is a supreme court ruling from Sep. 2003 (the so-called paperboy ruling) that deeplinking (together with headlines and ledes) is legal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately in Germany there is a supreme court ruling from Sep. 2003 (the so-called paperboy ruling) that deeplinking (together with headlines and ledes) is legal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GateHouse Media takes on the New York Times Company &#124; Daily Loaf</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2008/12/23/gatehouse-lawsuit-new-york-times-dire-implications-for-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-32014</link>
		<dc:creator>GateHouse Media takes on the New York Times Company &#124; Daily Loaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 00:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/?p=716#comment-32014</guid>
		<description>[...] have free speech and fair use advocates burning up their keyboards, perhaps with good reason. In a blog post on Journalistopia, Danny Sanchez writes:  The lawsuit, if successful, could create a monumental chilling effect for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have free speech and fair use advocates burning up their keyboards, perhaps with good reason. In a blog post on Journalistopia, Danny Sanchez writes:  The lawsuit, if successful, could create a monumental chilling effect for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GateHouse: O hai, internetz &#8212; we r fail</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2008/12/23/gatehouse-lawsuit-new-york-times-dire-implications-for-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-32003</link>
		<dc:creator>GateHouse: O hai, internetz &#8212; we r fail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/?p=716#comment-32003</guid>
		<description>[...] But surely this is the way the Internet works, you are saying to yourself. And so it is. GateHouse apparently doesn&#8217;t like the way the Internet works. That puts the company in the same category as the World Newspaper Association and forward-thinking types like Chicago Tribune owner Sam Zell, who have repeatedly criticized Google for linking to news stories from its Google News search engine, or the Belgian newspapers that sued Google over similar tactics. All of these groups are trying to turn back time, to play King Canute with the rolling wave that is the Web, instead of trying to find ways of using that wave to their mutual advantage. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But surely this is the way the Internet works, you are saying to yourself. And so it is. GateHouse apparently doesn&#8217;t like the way the Internet works. That puts the company in the same category as the World Newspaper Association and forward-thinking types like Chicago Tribune owner Sam Zell, who have repeatedly criticized Google for linking to news stories from its Google News search engine, or the Belgian newspapers that sued Google over similar tactics. All of these groups are trying to turn back time, to play King Canute with the rolling wave that is the Web, instead of trying to find ways of using that wave to their mutual advantage. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: End of Blogging at B12 Solipsism</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2008/12/23/gatehouse-lawsuit-new-york-times-dire-implications-for-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-32000</link>
		<dc:creator>End of Blogging at B12 Solipsism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/?p=716#comment-32000</guid>
		<description>[...] [From Journalistopia » GateHouse Lawsuit vs. New York Times Co. has Dire Implications &#124; Danny Sanchez] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [From Journalistopia » GateHouse Lawsuit vs. New York Times Co. has Dire Implications | Danny Sanchez] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A link too far? &#124; Kiesow 7.0</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2008/12/23/gatehouse-lawsuit-new-york-times-dire-implications-for-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-31996</link>
		<dc:creator>A link too far? &#124; Kiesow 7.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/?p=716#comment-31996</guid>
		<description>[...] GateHouse Lawsuit vs. New York Times Co. has Dire Implications A Danger to Journalism GateHouse: O hai, internetz — we r fail [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GateHouse Lawsuit vs. New York Times Co. has Dire Implications A Danger to Journalism GateHouse: O hai, internetz — we r fail [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2008/12/23/gatehouse-lawsuit-new-york-times-dire-implications-for-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-31995</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/?p=716#comment-31995</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up Tish. I&#039;m going to post an update soon with more commentary and will include Dan&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up Tish. I&#8217;m going to post an update soon with more commentary and will include Dan&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tish Grier</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2008/12/23/gatehouse-lawsuit-new-york-times-dire-implications-for-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-31994</link>
		<dc:creator>Tish Grier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/?p=716#comment-31994</guid>
		<description>Danny,

you may want to check out Dan Kennedy&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://medianation.blogspot.com/2008/12/how-gatehouse-suit-looks-from-both.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post on this issue&lt;/a&gt;.  Dan knows the Boston newspaper in a way I don&#039;t think anyone else does, and his thoughts on this (he also broke the story) raise some important points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny,</p>
<p>you may want to check out Dan Kennedy&#8217;s <a href="http://medianation.blogspot.com/2008/12/how-gatehouse-suit-looks-from-both.html" rel="nofollow">post on this issue</a>.  Dan knows the Boston newspaper in a way I don&#8217;t think anyone else does, and his thoughts on this (he also broke the story) raise some important points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A danger to journalism</title>
		<link>http://journalistopia.com/2008/12/23/gatehouse-lawsuit-new-york-times-dire-implications-for-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-31993</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A danger to journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistopia.com/?p=716#comment-31993</guid>
		<description>[...] says: If GateHouse were to have its way with its deep link argument, it would create a legal precedent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] says: If GateHouse were to have its way with its deep link argument, it would create a legal precedent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
